After Tehran condemned Interpol’s red notices issued against five Iranian officials allegedly involved in the 1994 AMIA attack, opposition lawmaker Ricardo Gil Lavedra questioned the reliability of the Memorandum.
“This divergence in interpretations show that the so called memorandum between both countries has not actually being such (understanding),” Gil Lavedra stated.
In recent statements to Iran’s state news agency IRNA, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said Interpol should suppress the red notices following the agreement reached with his Argentine counterpart Héctor Timerman and signed into law by the Congress of Argentina back in February given the national government’s control of both Houses of Congress.
“We were not just a few who warned that Iran’s intentions were heading that way and that one of its aims was to get an instrument that allowed them to remove the red notices targeting those they consider innocent and unfairly accused,” the Radical Party lawmaker affirmed.
Gil Lavedra also complaint about what he called an “express” and “rash” congress treatment of the bilateral agreement and considered the possibility Iran requested a “revision of Interpol’s alerts seeking the General Assembly of the organism reverses its statemens.”
Las week, the International Police Organization officially said that Buenos Aires-Tehran accord does not involve a change of status in the red alerts issued over the bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in 1994.
“Statement of Iranian Foreign Minister unveils that the Iranian regime in not interested in finding the truth about the AMIA case and is only looking for impunity for the suspects it has already declared innocents”, the opposition lawmaker insisted.
Source: Buenos Aires Herald